| Score | Label | Descriptor |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Not Addressed | No reflection or does not respond to the task. |
| 1 | Minimal | Very limited response; shows little understanding of the research process or group work. |
| 2 | Basic | Describes what happened but gives limited explanation or connection to learning. |
| 3 | Developing | Shows some understanding of research and group work, but explanations are partial or general. |
| 4 | Clear | Clear explanation of learning, strengths, and weaknesses with relevant examples. |
| 5 | Insightful | Strong reflection with clear reasoning, specific examples, and concrete improvements. |
| Criterion | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| Understanding of Research Process | How well the student explains what they learned about research topics, questions, or methods. |
| Application to Own Work | How clearly the student connects reflection to their own research topic or question. |
| Group Work Reflection | How well the student reflects on participation, communication, and collaboration. |
| Identification of Strengths and Weaknesses | How clearly the student identifies what worked well and what needs improvement. |
| Actionable Improvement | How specific and realistic the student’s next steps are for improving their work. |